RSS
 

Archive for June, 2009

Intel Announces New “sextium”; Processor

16 Jun

Industry observers have for some time now wondered why Intel persisted with the Pentium name for processors considerably more advanced than the original Pentium. The Pentium Pro, Pentium II and now the Pentium III have all been released, leading many pundits to speculate that it was high time the Sextium name was used.

“In retrospect, I don’t know why we didn’t call the P-Pro the Sextium,” said Intel CEO Andy Grove in an interview with Dan’s Data. “I mean, it’s not like it means something rude in Spanish, or something.” Upon being asked whether this was a reference to Intel’s disastrous decision to release the original Pentium in Hispanic countries as the Putanum, Mr Grove declined to comment.

An Intel source who asked to remain anonymous spoke to us after Mr Grove had left, and explained that Intel had originally intended the new processor to be called the Hextium, but “that was a bit too obvious, know what I mean?”

We do not know what he meant.

The new Sextium part is scheduled to debut in Q2 of 2000, with distribution anticipated to commence exactly one year from the April 1st product announcement. The initial clock speed will be only 666MHz (Front Side Bus 133MHz, 5X multiplier), as Intel has reported mysterious problems achieving higher speeds with the new component. Craig Johnson, strategic planner for Intel’s 32-bit product, commented on these difficulties as follows: “It’s really not a problem. 666 megahertz is a very good speed. Very good indeed. Yes. Good.” His eyes then glazed over and he walked slowly away, apparently oblivious to our further questions.

Pricing of the new processor for 1000 unit orders is expected to be an unprecedented $US10,000, although Intel have hinted at an as yet unexplained alternative payment program in which end users are apparently required to sign a special contract, and will receive in return a 666MHz Sextium processor, as well, confusingly, as what is described as “all their worldly desires”.

Ron Peck, Intel’s director of Value PC Marketing, described this special deal as “Marvellous value for the small office and home user, or indeed for corporate users or, well, pretty much anyone, really.” When pressed for details of the special contract, Peck said: “It’s a simple arrangement, a… covenant, if you will… between the chip purchasers and a greater… power.” When asked if the “greater power” he referred to was Intel, he replied “Of course. Yes. Ha ha ha! What did you think I meant! Ha ha! The interview’s over! Go away!”

A sample of the special contract was not available at the time of going to press; according to an Intel spokesperson, the company is “experiencing some minor issues related to the acquisition of the correct kind of parchment.”

The Sextium’s revolutionary new processor package approaches the size of the conventional Pentium II or III cartridge, but fits into a 514 pin ZIF socket instead of the PII/III edge connector. None of these “Socket 514″ motherboards are currently available, but Intel and other manufacturers promise to have them available in time for the release of the Sextium. Representatives of leading motherboard manufacturers Abit, AOpen, Chaintech, Diamond, Shuttle, Supermicro and Tyan said in a statement earlier today: “We are strongly committed to supporting this exciting new processor. Let there be no doubt about our loyalty. No doubt at all. We will not fail you, lord Intel.”

John Miner, vice president and general manager of Intel’s Enterprise Server division, explained that a Xeon version of the new CPU will be available, for server applications. “It’ll basically fill the same market niche as the current Pentium II and Pentium III Xeons, but the name will be different.” When asked what the name of the new Xeon-class processor would be, Miner explained: “It’s kind of impossible for humans to pronounce. It still starts with an X, though.” He went on to say that Intel anticipated strong sales of this “Processor that Must Not Be Named” at corporations such as Procter and Gamble, Lucent and Microsoft, as well as numerous purchases by “a significant market segment, those guys who build twin Xeon machines and then run Windows 95 on them.” Miner later described this segment of the Xeon market as “about as sharp as a sack full of wet toilet rolls”.

Robert Jecman, vice president and general manager of Intel’s mobile and handheld products group, has also promised a mobile version of the Sextium. “It’ll be mobile all right. Everybody’ll be using them. They’ll practically – ha, ha – practically be a part of you!” He then pointed at his hand and grinned.

A spokesperson for Pope John Paul II has released a statement on the new processor which makes reference to it being “exactly what we’ve been warning you about all this time,” and goes on to say “That’s it. You’re on your own. Go on, go and play Quake 3! Go on, do it! See if we care!”

Representatives of other ecclesiastical orders were not available for comment. Dan’s Data has received unconfirmed reports of senior clergy purchasing canned food and shotguns.

whitemaster

 
 

AMD Versus Intel CPU War

10 Jun

If you are in the market to purchase a computer there are many options in existence. You can purchase a Hewlett Packard, Gateway, IBM, or a custom built system. But there is one thing that all of these computers will utilize and that is a CPU (central processing unit). The CPU is responsible for interpreting and executing instructions for the motherboard. CPU’s are key to the functioning of your new computer. CPU’s from Intel and AMD power virtually every personal computer that you can purchase today.

The argument over an AMD CPU versus an Intel CPU and which has a higher functionality is currently raging. Simply two years ago this was not even a question. Anyone would tell you that the Intel CPU won the speed and complex algorithm war with AMD CPU’s without question. Fast-forward to today and Intel is now playing catch-up to the latest in AMD technologies.

Intel played marketing games with their CPU’s pricing them high and touting the functionality that they posses as cutting edge. AMD started out as the cheap alternative CPU manufacturer for computer brands such as e-Machines and low-end Compaqs. From the beginning, AMD CPU’s were fighting an uphill battle to catch up with the technology in the Intel CPU. As the years have progressed, AMD has progressed.

AMD now clearly leads in the consumer pricing wars. AMD CPU equipped machines with similar performance specifications will cost you hundreds of dollars less than equivalent Intel CPU based machines. This cost differential is now enough to push many Intel CPU customers to the upstart AMD CPU equipped machines.

If performance is the main concern over price, the AMD CPU line was the first to include 64 bit technology. In 2003 AMD pushed the first 64 bit CPU to market. It was unstable and unreliable at first. But the underlying architecture was sound. The AMD 64 bit CPU was soon running stable and fast. The performance of this AMD CPU caught the Intel CPU team off guard.

Intel had to rush to market their EMT64 CPU to compete with this upstart challenge from AMD. The next item on the board was dual CPU power. Again, AMD one-upped the Intel CPU rule.

AMD CPU’s have the information transfer on a dual chip machine flowing through the chips. The Intel dual CPU has a bridge to the motherboard where the information that is being processed by the dual CPU’s flows for splitting.

The internal data flow in the AMD CPU’s allows them to function with lower heat generation than the dual core Intel CPU’s. As a consumer this lower heat generation allows the AMD CPU to last longer than the Intel CPU.

If you are energy conscious, then the AMD CPU will be for you as well. The AMD CPU equipped motherboard will function with approximately 275 watts of power. Compare that to a similarly equipped Intel processor at 400 watts of power, and you have major energy savings by going to the AMD CPU.

So where do the Intel CPU’s win out over the AMD CPU’s? The Intel CPU’s are able to function faster with single programs. So, if you are going to play one game and only that game on your machine, the Intel CPU equipped machine can pull and analyze the data faster. However add in chat and e-mail running in the background and the AMD CPU machine catches up.

All in all, the CPU processor war that is currently waging between AMD and Intel is great for the consumer. Each company is in the middle of a CPU processor one-upmanship and both are looking to gain market share.

Chris Hall is the owner of Australian-based StoneBridge Computing specialising in the sale of Computers, Laptops, Hardware and Software. www.stonebridgecomputing.com.au